THE CINEMA GROUP

View Original

Quentin Tarantino Proclaims ‘Toy Story 3’ as the Ultimate Trilogy Closer, Rejects ‘Toy Story 4’

Getty Images/Disney

Quentin Tarantino, a filmmaker known for his critical and precise taste in film narratives, has openly dismissed the idea of watching “Toy Story 4,” declaring “Toy Story 3” as the pinnacle of animated storytelling. In a candid conversation on Bill Maher’s “Club Random” podcast, Tarantino expressed his views on why he believes the third installment was where the story should have rightfully ended.

Tarantino, an Oscar-winning director, is famously selective about the films he considers worthy of the title ‘trilogy.’ He praised “Toy Story 3” for achieving what he considers a rare feat in cinema: a perfect conclusion that surpasses its predecessors in depth and emotional impact. He compared the “Toy Story” trilogy to the iconic “Dollars Trilogy” by Sergio Leone, highlighting how each sequel in both series elevated the overarching narrative.

However, Tarantino critiqued the decision to extend the “Toy Story” saga with a fourth movie and an upcoming fifth, feeling it undermines the conclusive nature of the third film’s storytelling. He shared that while the global success of “Toy Story 4,” which garnered rave reviews and achieved over $1 billion in box office receipts, is undeniable, it does not tempt him to engage with a narrative he feels should have already concluded.

Tarantino’s staunch stance on “Toy Story 4” underscores his broader perspective on film series, where he values a strong, definitive ending over continued commercial success. His critique extends to other trilogies like “Mad Max,” where he feels the final films lacked the closure provided by earlier installments.

The revelation from Tarantino not only highlights his deep respect for cohesive storytelling but also sets a bar for how sequels and series should aim to enhance or conclude their narratives. With “Toy Story 5” on the horizon, directed by Andrew Stanton of “Finding Nemo” and “Wall-E” fame, it remains to be seen if it can sway Tarantino’s firm viewpoint on the franchise’s legacy.



Quentin Tarantino, renowned for his discerning taste in film and storytelling, has decisively chosen not to watch “Toy Story 4,” despite its critical acclaim and box office success. His admiration for “Toy Story 3” as a flawless closure to the original trilogy leaves him content with the narrative as it stood, marking a perfect end in his view. In an interview, Tarantino expressed his reverence for film trilogies that conclude strongly, using “A Fistful of Dollars” trilogy as an exemplar of cinematic perfection, where each subsequent film elevates the saga conclusively.

Tarantino’s critique extends to other trilogies where he feels the final installment didn’t measure up, such as the “Mad Max” series, where he felt “Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome” did not uphold the escalating excellence set by its predecessors. His decision to skip “Toy Story 4” stems from a desire to preserve the sanctity of the trilogy’s original ending, which he regards as sublime. This stance reflects his broader views on film and storytelling, where completion and perfection in narrative arcs are paramount.

While “Toy Story 4” did achieve notable success, winning an Academy Award and garnering over $1 billion globally, Tarantino’s personal choice underscores his commitment to narrative integrity over commercial success. His focus remains on films that deliver a consistent and satisfying conclusion, resonant with his filmmaking ethos. As “Toy Story 5” is announced, directed by Andrew Stanton of “Finding Nemo” fame, it remains to be seen whether Tarantino will maintain his stance, but his current resolve is clear: the original trilogy’s conclusion was unmatched, and for him, the story concluded there.

Article Source: Variety

Tags: Quentin Tarantino, Toy Story 4, Toy Story 3, Film Trilogy, Animated Movies


THE CINEMA GROUP - YOUR PREMIER SOURCE FOR THE LATEST IN FILM AND ENTERTAINMENT NEWS. FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA @THECINEMAGROUP.

See this social icon list in the original post